Advanced Search | Search Tips
April 2009

Time for an 'Orange Revolution'

by Jamie F. Metzl

Posted April 15, 2009

The see-saw color war of Thai politics is teetering once again.

Thaksin Shinawatra came to power in 2001 and built a coalition based on insider politics, the support of the police, and, perhaps most importantly, the backing of Thai farmers and urban workers who had previously felt disenfranchised by the privileged classes.

When the backlash against official corruption and perceived authoritarian populism and fiscal irresponsibility came to a head, Mr. Thaksin’s red tide was swept away by a sea of yellow shirt-clad members of the Thai establishment—middle class, elites, royalists, and the Thai military.

After the 2006 coup, elections were held that brought the red-shirted Thaksinites back to power, albeit with Mr. Thaksin now in exile, a process that was reversed four months ago when the Thai Supreme Court paved the way, alongside a sea of yellow-shirted protesters, for the current Prime Minister, Abhisit Vejjajiva to come to power.

Now Mr. Thaksin has called for a popular revolt, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean)-led East Asia Summit has been shut down after being stormed by red-shirted protestors, violence has erupted in Bangkok, martial law has been declared, and the color wars have started again with no end in sight. Or is there?

Somehow, somewhere, someone has to put an end to this see-sawing back and forth of Thai politics before it is too late. Perhaps it is easy for someone sitting at a computer 9,000 miles away to call for compromise on both sides, but it is clear from this distance that the zero-sum approach to Thai politics is leading the country down a rat hole.

It's also clear that both sides have something valid to say: The red shirts are right that the poor deserve better health care, more access to capital, and a greater voice in Thai politics. The yellow shirts are right that government institutions need to be strengthened, that state assets cannot be used to enrich corrupt government officials, and that the state treasury cannot be any politician’s or party’s campaign fund. Thailand needs more democracy, stronger institutions, and more accountability for its officials—goals which should ultimately appeal to all Thais if framed correctly.

The problem is that Thai politics has become so polarized that it’s difficult for different factions to find common ground. So what’s the way forward? Are there not 10 elder statesmen and women, five from each side, who might come together to map out a compromise? Surely respected representatives from the yellow-shirts and the red-shirts can find common cause to bring Thailand’s democracy back from the brink?

What’s clear is that the current back and forth between red and yellow revolutions will not be sustainable for Thailand, and that the only way forward will ultimately be an orange revolution, part yellow part red, that seeks to address the legitimate concerns of both sides and to lay out an inclusive vision for Thailand’s long-term stability, security, prosperity, and participatory democracy.

Let the orange revolution begin.

Jamie F. Metzl is the executive vice president of the Asia Society and a former member of the National Security Council under U.S. President Bill Clinton. The views expressed are his own.

comments (8)
boon @ 2009-04-19 03:31:56
Using coup to deal with corruption and abused of power allegations is illegal. Another government, including that of PPP formed after the coup are illegal. The present illegal government even has criminals who invaded government house and airports sitting in their cabinet. If the world cannot accept the military junta of Myanmar who refused to accept the election result, then the world should not tolerate this government because they came to power through the military and some privy council members' interference in politic. These PC members with the generals did not accept the people's wish and use TRT opponents to stage armed protest which the military did not crack down like they did to the red shirt.
Israphan Yanyong @ 2009-04-18 11:45:44
It is true late to have an orange resolution. Thailand has been divided too deeply after Sept 19, 2005. When somebody (the Coup maker and the red shirted movement) broke the law and went unprosecuted and even supported by a certain group of people, others are obliged to do so. So are the red shirts and many more to come. The conflict is to get worse before it gets better. When the crisis reaches the lowest point, we will see how we can get out of this mess.
polo @ 2009-04-18 03:09:57
What a silly simplistic article! On what constitutional basis would the 10 meet, and what would they sort out? Rewrite the constitution (again)? Decide to hold or not hold elections (isn't that what the Reds want)? Decide a new "unity government" (which is always heavily in the military and palace camp)? Then, it is easy to find 5 "statesmen" from the yellow/palace camp. But who would be a "statesman" from the red camp, when, for many of them, their problem is the "statesman" dominated system? Let's just say, five leaders from both sides do meet. What exactly would they negotiate, what would they settle on? As many people have written, but Metzl avoids acknowledging, taken as a whole the past three years have been about the locus of power: a palace-military alliance under a munificent king, or the prime minister and parliament, popularly elected with all the good and bad that comes with that. The issues are not rural health care or state assets being ripped off. The issues are, how is the king's power used? What is the military role in politics? How to apply the rule of law -- who is above it? And who or what is the ultimate arbiter of politics? Yes Thailand needs what Metzl says. But this article fails to shed any light on the situation, and instead obscures it.
garislk @ 2009-04-17 23:46:04
PAD supporters were paid to block the airports. What is your point? Most red shirts are not thugs, they want true democracy. The people of the North and East have not sold their votes, every one, the kangaroo courts have not proven anything except the complicity of the courts in illegal proccesses leading to dictatorship. Mr. "Wonderful" Abhisit stood by, no he supported, the killing of many including two monks in the recent disturbances. The PAD acted as badly, causing millions of Baht in damages during their protests at Government House, but nothing happened to them - proof of unequal treatment. Who knows what they would have done if the Army moved on them, but the Army did not. It was after the killings began that red shirts starting fighting, for their lives. The charges mentioned have not been proved, viseos exist of Mr. Abhisit's men paying off Senators to vote for Democrat..
Ashi @ 2009-04-15 19:03:23
I think, all of thai they are bad action and opinion in their politics. I means both sides, perhaps thirth side will be come soon.
suriya @ 2009-04-15 19:02:21
I agree with orange revolution, may be not only orange but mixed colour revolution. When we say about law and rules, law for what and of whome? The law that every one respects protects and obays and follows the rules or regulation must be the law that everyone agrees with and belongs to everyone. It's not the law of the rulers or governers and of course it has justice for every side or everyones. Suriya Hemtasilpa. Thailand.
@ 2009-04-15 13:34:54
After the cancellation of the 2007 election due to vote buying proven in court with secretly taped video clips of large amounts of cash the elction was cancelled. The red shirt movemnet is a terroist movement and not at all a democratic movemnet. It is stocked with people who are paid to participate. Taxi drivers were paid 3000 baht per day to park their cars and block traffic. No taxi who owned his own car would participate. They say they want an elction so they can rig it only and get a new proxy for Thaksin in. This would most likeley be Chalerm Yumbruguang a very corrupt and famous politician. To say he is no more than a thug would be putting it mildly. I am a Thai university teavher and I soemtimes go out of the country. I cannot believe what nonsense is reported in the western press about this. Abhisit is wonderful comappared to any of our recnt Prime Ministers. A gift from god. Please take note of what I sa. There is some debate as to whether we should allow the people in the north east and north a vote. They have all sold their votes in the past, everyone. SHould we allow this to go on so we can elect rulers who steal every baht they can from ridiculous expensive government projects with their cronies. Should we allow Mr. Thaksin caught bribing Supreme Court Judges with his lawyers (Pastrygate) to return until more investigatoions are conducted into the bombing of the constitutional court (election cancelled because of them) judges houses, the bombings caried out on the PAD nightly by the red shirts and General Sae Daeng, the investigation of the gross fraud at the airport project, subway project, fire truck project, x ray scanner project etc. Should we drop the 23 other criminal charges made and finally shoud we not investigate the murder of 3000 "drug traffickers" of which half were found innocent by the human rights commission? These are serious questions to serious problems especially the extra judicial killings. Sometimes serious problems require serious measures to solve them and a media that is prepared to face the truth.
Lawrence C. @ 2009-04-15 13:10:42
Lest a full blown civil war breaks out I believe it is high time for the Thai king (the 'deux ex machina') to make his presence felt and break this political impasse.
 
Name:
Email:

Comment:

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code. For security reasons, please type the code you see in the image on the left.

 

Read Also

Thailand Needs New Elections

by Colum Murphy

The REVIEW's deputy editor on where Thai democracy went wrong and how to fix it.

read more

Essays

read more
SlimStats Ignoring Local User.