August 2008

Olympic Fatigue

by Gordon G. Chang

Posted August 15, 2008

Last Friday, perhaps the biggest television audience in history saw the rapture on the faces of Chinese citizens during the four-hour opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics. Reports, in both domestic and foreign media, say that the Chinese people overwhelmingly support the Games and the authoritarian government now staging the 17-day extravaganza.

Yet last week, long-term residents evicted from their homes clashed with neighborhood guards near Tiananmen Square, and two men in western China killed 16 paramilitary troops. There were reports, still unconfirmed, that a bomb exploded on a bus in the Chinese capital on Wednesday, near the route for the Olympic torch relay. In late spring and summer, there were bus bombings, police killings, and large-scale demonstrations across China. One protest attracted an estimated 30,000 citizens. In March, an ethnic insurrection scarred Tibetan areas in the southwest. Restive Muslims then took to the streets in the northwest.

In light of the antigovernment turbulence in the country, should we believe that the Chinese people are enthusiastic about the Games? Of course, nobody knows what some 1.5 billion Chinese really think. Organizations conduct opinion surveys in China, but polls are strictly controlled by the government and are inherently unreliable on sensitive topics. It is true that state media for months has been chock full of stories of flag-waving Chinese cheering on the nation’s athletes and even pot-bellied officials as the Olympic torch made its way through each of the Mainland’s 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and provincial-level cities.

Yet access to the torch relays, whether in reviewing stands or alongside roads, was severely restricted in many locations with spectators carefully screened and closely watched. This was especially true for the gathering in Tiananmen on Aug. 6 as the Olympic flame finally arrived in the capital. That crowd was composed of people from select groups, such as Olympic sponsors, and transported to the site by organizers of the relay. Ordinary Chinese were turned away from the orchestrated torch events, both in Beijing and elsewhere.

The Chinese people, whether permitted to watch Olympic events or not, feel genuine pride that their country is hosting the event. Yet what we see today is nothing like the spontaneous jubilation that swept the entire country the night the award was announced in July 2001. Then, millions of people in Beijing surged through streets, yelling, crying, and high-fiving, blaring car horns and waving Chinese flags. That night, there was a party in Tiananmen, the spiritual heart of the country, and celebrations in hamlets across the country. Last Friday, however, the giant screens in Beijing’s public areas were turned off and restaurants and cinemas were closed so crowds would not gather in the city center.

Today, no permitted gathering in public is unrehearsed, and joy is expressed on cue. The Olympics are definitely not the galvanizing force they once appeared to be. What happened to China in the interim? The Communist Party has employed mass-mobilization techniques and reimposed strict social controls, the hallmarks of totalitarian governance, in order to stage the Olympic extravaganza. Along the way the cadres have worn out the people they are leading. As a well-known fund manager in Beijing told me in late June, “There is now an Olympics fatigue.”

My wife and I traveled around China’s coastal cities in June and last month, and we were surprised by how little enthusiasm for the Games we saw, even in Beijing. “The Olympics are for the government,” grumbled one middle-aged resident of the capital, echoing views we heard elsewhere during our visit. “We ordinary Chinese still have to earn a living.” There appears to be even less interest in other parts of the country, especially in areas further from Beijing. Many Shanghainese, even into this summer, did not know that their city would be the site of Olympic competitions.

We did not meet people who were genuinely jazzed about the Games—until we went to Hong Kong. China’s Special Administrative Region appears genuinely proud to host the Olympic equestrian events. Of course, the residents of the former British colony did not experience communist rule there and are, as a consequence, less cynical than their Mainland compatriots.

Inside China, Communist Party leaders seem increasingly insecure. Once they expected 125 million tourists to come to their capital this year. They built the world’s largest airport terminal—which at nearly two miles long is also the world’s largest building—and over a hundred new hotels to handle the expected influx.

Yet if the dreams of officials were big, their fears were bigger still. Sometime this spring, in the face of all the disorder in Chinese society, they reversed course, denying visas to businessmen and tourists holding Olympics tickets, ejecting long-term foreign residents, and preventing Chinese citizens from visiting their own capital. Today, there are three rings of checkpoints guarding Beijing. Over 400,000 troops, police and volunteers patrol Olympic venues and nearby sites and neighborhoods.

Chinese citizens are not the only victims of Beijing's enhanced police state. A British journalist was recently detained while trying to cover a pro-Tibet protest near an Olympic venue, and journalists from Denmark and Norway left the country after they were harassed by Chinese authorities while trying to report a story about Beijing’s clampdown on migrant workers.

We should not be surprised that the Communist Party is hosting the “No-Fun Olympics.” Communism, whether hard-line or reformed, never celebrates the individual. As a result, it has managed to ruin a national celebration for the great people of China.

Mr. Chang is the author of “The Coming Collapse of China” (Random House, 2001).

 

comments (6)
Freeman Chung @ 2008-09-01 19:06:10
The world needs more people like Gordon Chang to remind us what the despotic regime is doing behind the scene. What upsets me was that some of those overseas Chinese from those countries of illiberal and repressive social systems seem now so readily to applaud Beijing's despots.
B T Tan @ 2008-08-29 10:32:32
The latest projected figure for the population of China is near 1.35 billions. There was a typo error in my earlier comment. My apology.
B T Tan @ 2008-08-28 15:25:44
There is no necessity to pick on small skirmishes and over-exaggerate minor protests again and again. Give China a breathing space, please. Granted that the estimate of 30,000 people attending a protest is accurate, it still constitutes a tiny yet insignificant fraction of the total population of 13.5 billions. Nowadays, demonstrators may turn up in the million -- just look at what have happened in Taiwan, South Korea and Thailand. The impact could still be negligible. Writers ought to focus their attention on more pertinent and practical issues. (Tan Boon Tee)
Patrick Tan @ 2008-08-25 18:56:04
In a country of 1.3 billion people, there will always be widely diverging viewpoints. Using separatist violence in Xinjiang and bus bombings to claim the Chinese people are not enthusiastic about the games is pretty pathetic. I was in Beijing for a few days during the games, and enthusiasm was everywhere - people were glued to their TVs and radios, eagerly tracking the progress of Team China. This is a moment of huge pride and joy for many, many Chinese people - China topped the tables, leading from start to finish, the venues were awe-inspiring, and optimism is in the air. Gordon Chang has always seen China in a negative light; that he can find grumbling people in a country as populous as China is no big surprise. He has simply chosen to ignore the cheering crowds or claim that those who are cheering are "programmed" by the government to do so. I don't think any reasonable person would believe for one moment that the flag waving people in Wangfujing or on the Olympic Green were "programmed" by the government. Look no further than the gigantic counter demonstrations held by Chinese across the world during the torch relay - most attendees were young Chinese intellectuals, with free access to Western media and every website in the world. Or is Gordon Chang going to claim that every patriotic Chinese person is a mere puppet of the all-powerful party?
Patrick Tan @ 2008-08-25 18:55:45
In a country of 1.3 billion people, there will always be widely diverging viewpoints. Using separatist violence in Xinjiang and bus bombings to claim the Chinese people are not enthusiastic about the games is pretty pathetic. I was in Beijing for a few days during the games, and enthusiasm was everywhere - people were glued to their TVs and radios, eagerly tracking the progress of Team China. This is a moment of huge pride and joy for many, many Chinese people - China topped the tables, leading from start to finish, the venues were awe-inspiring, and optimism is in the air. Gordon Chang has always seen China in a negative light; that he can find grumbling people in a country as populous as China is no big surprise. He has simply chosen to ignore the cheering crowds or claim that those who are cheering are "programmed" by the government to do so. I don't think any reasonable person would believe for one moment that the flag waving people in Wangfujing or on the Olympic Green were "programmed" by the government. Look no further than the gigantic counter demonstrations held by Chinese across the world during the torch relay - most attendees were young Chinese intellectuals, with free access to Western media and every website in the world. Or is Gordon Chang going to claim that every patriotic Chinese person is a mere puppet of the all-powerful party?
Josie Nguyen @ 2008-08-21 03:53:16
In the eyes of people like Gordon Chang, China can do nothing, absolutely nothing, right. China will never be allowed to have its own way; for good or bad. Isn't it the Western idea that we should respect how other people make their own decisions? If the Chinese people think their government is not democratic, or not democratic enough, then by the very Western idea of democracy, shouldn't we just let the Chinese people decide whatever they want to do with it? Who are you Gordon Chang to criticize? Who are we readers of FEER to criticize? In a country of 1.5 billion people, you can be sure that at any one time there will be at least 1% of the people (and that is 15 million people in the case of China) who are angry at the government for virtually anything one can think of under the sun. Sure China is not as free as what many take for granted in the West, but try to put yourself in the shoes of an ordinary Chinese, things are getting much better over the past thirty years including freedom of expressions and yet criticisms on China from Western hawks like Gordon Chang are getting stronger and stronger. And if you are a rational thinking Chinese, what conclusion must you draw from this experience other than that you can never satisfy your enemies because, by definition, they are the enemies? By all means one should disagree with China if necessary but one must engage China and the way you can engage someone meaningfully in a conversation is to watch the 'TONE' of our own voice. It's not "what" you say but "how" you say it that gets others engaged, or not.
 
Name:
Email:

Comment:

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code. For security reasons, please type the code you see in the image on the left.

 

Essays

read more
SlimStats Ignoring Local User.