Letters
The PAP's Challenge
Hugo Restall (“Pressure Builds on Singapore’s System,” Sept, 5, 2008) painted a bleak picture of a system that was losing its ability to generate economic growth and bind its people together.
Singapore faces the same challenges of globalization as other advanced economies: competition from low-cost competitors and pressures on the wages of less-skilled workers. In response, we are restructuring the economy, promoting new investments and entrepreneurship, and providing direct assistance to the poor.
Consequently, Singapore has averaged 7% economic growth and 3% productivity growth over the last five years, and has one of the lowest unemployment rates internationally. We are not doing too badly.
Mr. Restall is mistaken to view the government initiatives to help the poor as bowing towards the welfare systems that are “the hallmark of Western democracies.” Our assistance schemes are structured to encourage individuals to do well through their own efforts. For example, the Workfare Income Supplement scheme requires low wage workers to stay in a job.
Overall, Singapore has one of the lowest rates of taxation and government spending in the world. Otherwise the World Economic Forum and the Institute of Management Development would not regularly rate Singapore as one of the most competitive economies globally.
Mr. Restall questions Singaporeans’ support for the PAP, citing the 2006 General Elections when the PAP won 66% of the popular vote. He noted that this was lower than in 1980 and 2001, but omitted to state that 66% was higher than in all other general elections since 1980. How could the PAP have won this strong mandate if Singaporeans were disaffected and alienated?
Mr. Restall maintains that a more liberal and plural democracy will strengthen mutual support among citizens and create a more cohesive society. Can he point to any example in Asia?
We are encouraging the growth of civil society and alternative views in Singapore, but this does not require a weaker PAP. The PAP’s challenge is to continue reaching out to all segments of our society and renewing its leadership and ranks. It will enjoy Singaporeans’ support as long as it pursues policies that benefit the vast majority of Singaporeans, and forges a strong national consensus to build up the country.
Chen Hwai Liang
Press Secretary to the Prime Minister
Singapore
What ‘People’s Victory’?
Anwar Ibrahim’s victory was expected, a foregone conclusion.
Permatang Pauh has been the stronghold of Anwar’s family since the 1960s—first his father, then Anwar himself, his wife, and now back to him. Would you call that the victory of the people?
Jumping parties or crossing over is nothing new in Sabah politics. It happened several times before. Trying to rope in enough mps from the Barisan Nasional to form a new government, Anwar’s ambition to become the new premier could at best be short lived. Some pas stalwarts would never relegate themselves to be led by the nose. If their demands for power and positions are not met, pas is likely to be the first to pull out from the coalition.
The current political situation in Malaysia is disgusting if not nauseating. Instead of serving the needs of the electorate and focusing on how to improve the standard of living, the politicians prefer to indulge themselves in useless bickering and pathetic squabbles, wasting precious time and money.
Isn’t that flabbergasting?
Venze Chern & Tan Boon Tee
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
via feer.com
Give China a Break!
There is no need for Gordon Chang (“Olympic Fatigue” posted August 15, 2008) to pick on small skirmishes and overexaggerate minor protests. Give China some breathing room, please.
Even if 30,000 people decide to attend a protest, that number still only constitutes a tiny and insignificant fraction of China’s total population of 1.35 billion. Nowadays, demonstrators in other parts of the world often turn up in the millions—just look at what has happened in Taiwan, South Korea and Thailand. And even then, the impact could still be negligible.
Writers ought to focus their attention on more pertinent and practical issues.
Tan Boon Tee
Penang, Malaysia
Touché
Bertil Lintner’s July/August 2008 article “Temple Furor Exposes Delicate Ties” stated that Angkor Wat belonged to Thailand twice: first in the period before 1907 and again during the Thai occupation of northwestern Cambodia during World War II. In fact, although the city of Siem Reap became one of the Thai provinces during the war, Angkor Wat was in a territory that was under the sovereignty of French Indochina.
Sitthiphon Kruarattikan
Bangkok, Thailand









