Advanced Search | Search Tips
July 2009

Taking a Stand for China’s Uighurs

by Paulette Chu Miniter

Posted July 8, 2009

(Editor's Note: This article first appeared in the March 2007 edition of The Far Eastern Economic Review.)

On the morning of June 1 of this year, the Abdureyim family traveled with a police escort to what they believed would be an “International Children’s Day” celebration. But on a deserted stretch of the road, in the northwestern province of Xinjiang, China, the cars suddenly came to a halt. Within minutes brothers Ablikim and Alim were pulled outside and beaten to the ground. As their sister begged the officers to stop, one of them retorted, “Call your mother.”

It was then that Rebiya Kadeer’s phone rang in Virginia. She could hear her daughter crying and immediately understood what was happening -- this was the reason why she left China in the first place.

Little more than a decade ago, Ms. Kadeer was a symbol of China’s modernization. She is a Uighur, a Muslim ethnic minority inside the country. And as one of the wealthiest business owners in Xinjiang, she was touted by the government as an example of Beijing’s tolerance of economic prosperity for all. But today, the petite and soft-spoken mother of 11 is one of China’s highest-profile enemies. The government considers her an Islamic terrorist engaging in the forbidden “three forces” of terrorism, extremism and separatism. Yet internationally Ms. Kadeer has grown into a celebrated democracy activist for her one-woman campaign to liberate the Uighurs, winning support from the White House, U.S. Congress, human rights groups and a nomination for the Nobel Peace Price by a Swedish parliamentarian.

“The Chinese government thought I would stop my activities after my children were taken, but I can see now that they don’t truly know me,” she says.

Dressed in a vivid teal-blue suit with her graying hair twisted high into a bun, Ms. Kadeer, who spent six years in Chinese prison for her efforts, sits with her hands in her lap and legs crossed at the ankles in her offices in Washington, D.C. In a drive to “let China humiliate itself,” she has defied Beijing’s threats since being released from prison last spring, testifying before Congress, organizing demonstrations outside China’s U.S. embassy and giving numerous speeches and interviews. Recently, she began learning English.

Yet the work has come at a price. In November, China sentenced her son Alim to seven years in prison for alleged tax evasion in his role as caretaker of her commercial real estate and department store businesses. Her son Ablikim is awaiting trial on charges of subversion and has been seen taken from a detention center on a stretcher.

Ms. Kadeer describes what is happening to China’s Uighurs as a “moral crisis” and believes Beijing’s goal is to turn them into a “faithless” people. In response to China’s terrorist accusations, she has sniped: “If I terrify the Chinese government, then yes, I am a terrorist, and long may it last.”

More than half a century after Mao Zedong defeated Chiang Kai-shek in China’s civil war, the nation of 1.3 billion is finally emerging as the world’s next potential superpower. Yet China’s ascent remains a long one. Its human rights record is under constant attack on a number of issues, including its treatment of Falun Gong and the Dalai Lama, and now, Ms. Kadeer.

Not the typical portrait of a political dissident, Ms. Kadeer was a wealthy businesswoman who parlayed her financial success into positions in China’s parliament and was initially a willing partner to the Communist Party. But her success also emboldened her to begin demanding greater rights for China’s citizens, at first cautiously and then openly. “My people were losing their hope,” she says. “I wanted to expose the lies of the Chinese government and be a voice for my people in the international community -- it was a mission for me.”

“Our cultural and traditional values are being deteriorated,” she says. “This is a moral crisis for the Uighur people. While the liberalization of people in the world is moving forward, for the Uighur people it is moving backwards.”

It isn’t surprising the ruling party views Ms. Kadeer with contempt and alarm. Known as the “spiritual mother” of the Uighurs, the charismatic businesswoman is becoming a rallying figure for the Uighur movement, much as the Dalai Lama is for Tibetans. Less than two years after leaving China, Ms. Kadeer was elected president of the World Uighur Congress and Uighur American Association, which counts nearly all of the 1,000 Uighurs in the U.S. as members. In the process, she is single-handedly igniting interest in a heretofore little-known ethnic minority.

It is here that Ms. Kadeer poses the largest problem for China. As one former U.S. State Department official involved in her case says, “The difference between Rebiya Kadeer and other dissidents is that she hasn’t disappeared since leaving jail, and that is the real problem China has with her -- she’s not following the script.”

Ms. Kadeer’s most significant dint has been in simply calling attention to the Chinese government’s heavy hand toward Uighurs -- forced abortions, the closing of mosques, the prohibition against teaching the Uighur language in schools. She points out that China targets anything that highlights Uighurs’ cultural differences, which in her view amounts to an admission by China that the Uighur identity is indeed distinct. That is, Uighurs are unmistakably un-Chinese, an argument that forms the basis of their bid for independence.

Still, Ms. Kadeer hasn’t made politcal independence for China’s Uighurs the focus of her advocacy efforts. “The tactics I use are to make the most of living in a free democracy,” Ms. Kadeer said in testimony before a Congressional panel in April. “Simply telling the truth about what is happening to my family and my people. And I have faith in the power of democracy and truth.”
Though never formally educated, Ms. Kadeer, the daughter of farmers and small business owners, is a natural entrepreneur who prospered as China’s economic reforms began bearing fruit. She opened her first business, a laundry, in 1987, and went on to launch a department store and commercial real estate business.

As her wealth and philanthropy won her prominence, Ms. Kadeer says she felt she had the chance to improve the lives of her fellow Uighurs, the majority of who live in poor rural areas. Ms. Kadeer says she believed that Beijing would put a stop to the local government’s harsh tactics against Uighurs in Xinjiang as soon as high-level officials in the central government knew what was happening.
Her tipping point came in 1997, when a peaceful Uighur youth demonstration ended in a violent clash with Chinese police. Ms. Kadeer says she repeatedly tried to convince Beijing that change was needed, but to no avail. She felt she had no choice but to openly criticize the government, and so she did -- in a speech before parliament.

Beijing promptly kicked her out of the National People’s Congress and revoked her passport. At that point, her husband had already fled to the U.S. after being politically blacklisted for his own human rights efforts. Knowing there was no turning back, she began using her stature to reach out to the international community. In August 1999, she was on her way to meet a delegation of U.S. Congressional researchers when Chinese police caught up to her. She was arrested, charged with revealing state secrets to foreigners, and sentenced to eight years in prison, two of which she spent in solitary confinement. “The hell in this world is Chinese prison,” she says, though she says the prison guards “didn’t dare” torture her because her case was too well-known in the international community.

To her surprise, China released her from prison in March of last year -- two years early -- on “humanitarian” grounds in response to heavy pressure from the Bush administration. She says she would consider returning to her birth country, not as a political leader, but as a human rights and democracy advocate if Xinjiang’s Uighurs were to eventually win their independence.

“I personally believe China must be a democracy some day,” she says. “All of the international community believes China is becoming more powerful, but although they have more money now, they have no legitimacy.”

Ms. Miniter, a former journalism fellow at the Phillips Foundation in Washington, D.C., is a freelance journalist. This article first appeared in the March 2007 edition of The Far Eastern Economic Review.

comments (17)
Ben @ 2009-08-12 07:38:16
You know being a Uighur in China is like being Black in America. Remember the LA riots? Remember when that truck driver was taken out of his truck and beat to a bloody mess? Yeah remember how it was all over the news? Remember when we sent in police from every department in Southern California and eventually the national guard? Yeah it was what had to be done. But of course when China does the same thing against something on a much large scale with many times more civilian deaths... we decided to call it.... a "bloody crackdown". Same thing with Tibet... "bloody crackdown". Is that just a term that has been burned into the brains of our media that everything China does even if its to control a riot from spreading is now labeled a "bloody crackdown"? But of course if a riot started here and some rioters started charging police with knives and the police shot them... of course the police were just trying to protect themselves. But in Xinjiang China... guess what... "bloody crackdown." That exactly is wrong with us as a nation to be so biased and so easily coerced into siding with someone just because they can deliver bullshit in an eloquent manner. And this goes for Kadeer AND the Dalai Lama. Can we Americans wake up and stop being sheep? Lets get that light bulb on top of our heads lit up again so the rest of the world has some respect for our opinions. Thanks.....
Kepha @ 2009-07-22 03:21:09
Kali, when I worked in China, I saw the government bookstores selling inspirational portraits of Stalin. When my Chinese assistant learned that my last name was so funny because my ancestors were German, she informed me that she thought Hitler a great man. I politely told her that my WWII "ethnic heroes" were men like Gen. Eisenhower (under whom uncles of mine served) and Adm. Nimitz; that I thought Hitler one of the most evil men who ever lived; and, that as a Christian, I believed his soul was burning in Hell as we spoke. She was quite surprised that I should be so disloyal to "der alte Vaterland (zu guo)" from which three generations in America had separated me. Well, I've reached the conclusion that a country that admires both Stalin and Hitler deserves all Uighur rioters, Tibetan dissidents, and peasants who murder health officials over forced abortions that it can get--and all the unhappy people willing to become black-haired, white-to-tan-skinned Americans who can leave. And, don't forget, your beloved "blood and iron" Bismarck started the ball rolling on a path that led Germany to two disastrous world wars. Zou, zou, zou, zou, zou! Cong Zhongguo wo dei zou! Look up a song entitled "Ade Deutschland" to see this is an old tale.
Wahaha @ 2009-07-18 02:24:50
http://www.uocn.org/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=29398
Max @ 2009-07-16 03:56:04
Kali whoever you are. Surprised that you live in civilized country like America. You don't have to bring up the killing and big CHINESE nation concept to the table when someone has a different voice than yours. Why not you try to point your finger to your government and see what will happen to you and your family? No matter Chinese, Uighurs and Tibetans are suppressed by the China. There is no difference between you and Uighurs.
Michael_Chiange @ 2009-07-14 11:46:00
To Jody, excuse me for saying that your words are really weird, for i lived with chinese in my neighborhood and am now working in china. i think they are nice and live in a very humble way as most of asians do. it is now the fact that hundreds are murdered at streets. does it have anything to do with what you said in the post? do not tell me those who killed the innocent with daggers are forced to do so just because they are oppressed or tortued as second class citizens. i do know how those victims are suffering for i lost my classmates during another attack by muslims in new york. they, too, were innocent, who were working in the tower to offer people in time with breakfast. then what miseries forced them to hijack a plane?
Wahaha @ 2009-07-13 22:04:46
"Instead they insist that they have to break these cultures down into homogeniety. What, then, must they think of us, and what would they do to us, if they had the opportunity??"------ my advice to you is to learn your own history before educate others. China couldve taken over Korea, Japan, vietnam, Cambodia 1000 years ago without any problem.
Carlos @ 2009-07-13 15:34:26
Communist China doesnt deserve to become a respected super power like America. Communist has no respect for human rights, they destroy even their own minorties and thier history. Remember cultural revolution? Killing million of its own people? Soon Communist China will become like the Nazi in Germany and Imperial Japan before the war (Second World War) and will soon again crushed by Mother America. Evil nations will not last long no matter how strong they think they are.
Charlene @ 2009-07-13 14:35:25
Well if China is so great why are there so many Chinese-Americans/Australians/Canadians...? A French philosopher once said, the only terrible injustices are those where I do not benefit. The makings of a great nation indeed!
Ny @ 2009-07-13 04:34:39
Quote: "Ms. Kadeer was a symbol of China’s modernization. She is a Uighur, a Muslim ethnic minority inside the country. And as one of the wealthiest business owners in Xinjiang, she was touted by the government as an example of Beijing’s tolerance of economic prosperity for all. But today, the petite and soft-spoken mother of 11 is one of China’s highest-profile enemies" China's One Child Policy doesn't apply to its minority people; so Ms Kadeer was able to produce 11 children. Why don't the Chinese authority practise equality for all in China? One child policy for all, including the uighurs . Read more of my opinion about this riot: http://www.centurychina.com/plaboard/
Thomas @ 2009-07-12 12:38:15
Does any goverment in the world allow nearly 200 innocent people being killed? Dare the US government allow it to happen in any major city in the US? Why FEER publish an article about a woman that defends the thugs that kill innocent people? Are you going to publish an article praising Bin Laden?
kun lung @ 2009-07-11 08:28:35
Absolutely, Chinese American support! what are you doing here then in the states, go and pray to your Mao, Dao, or what it is called? stupid communist
Jody @ 2009-07-11 04:30:59
This is what I do not understand about China and the Chinese. Do Chinese people feel they are the best in the world? If so, then great! They have national pride. Do Chinese people feel their culture is the best in the world? If so, that is fine - most of us seem to believe that of our own culture. Here we come to the real point - do Chinese people believe inherently that the whole world should be Chinese, ethnically and culturally? If China had the ability, would it conquer Japan? India? Russia? Would it insist that the people of these countries be treated as second-class citizens unless they assimilated perfectly into the Chinese culture? This is where I believe China is very dangerous. The countries that they have conquered are, yes, now Chinese lands. But the people have their own cultures, just as we of other nations have our own cultures - the diversity of which can strengthen our nations. Instead they insist that they have to break these cultures down into homogeniety. What, then, must they think of us, and what would they do to us, if they had the opportunity??
Tom @ 2009-07-10 19:32:17
To Ms Miniter: Rebiya should not be worthy of our praise. I really doubt her credibility. During an interview, she claimed that rioters demonstrated peacefully, holding an enlarged picture to show the rest of the world, how peaceful the demonstration was. In fact, that picture was taken from a Chinese website which was actually showing a chinese protest a month earlier. You can look at the link below. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-07/10/content_8404890.htm Whether or not it was an honest mistake, it seriously raises the question of her credibility of her statements. More importantly, she seems deluded to an extent that the Chinese government "repressed" Uighurs. Seriously, anybody with brains can realise that if they really did then they wouldnt have given her a high ranking party position. More importantly she wouldn't be so successful in her business if it was not for the Chinese. Her views are seriously distorted in a sense in the belief that the chinese government are taking away their ethnic identity by banning mosque etc. In fact, their policy is not aimed at "repressing" their ethnic identity, but at creating stability. In fact, as we all know, Churches are also banned in China. In fact, to the chinese government, stability is the key. And whats wrong with that? Do we want a war torn places like countries such as Darfur and Iraq where there are wars everyday between tribal factions, genocide, and roadside bombs? No, I certainly don't. In fact, she is too ready to point fingers at the Chinese government for their economic disadvantages, instead of looking at themselves (the Uighurs). To put it bluntly, maybe the Uighurs are lazy ass-holes who dont want to work? Maybe the concept of working hard to be successful is not so ingrained into Uighur culture? The Chinese have the benefit of 3000 years of culture. The Uighurs, on the other hand porbably do not. They, seeing the rich Chinese, resent it because they have not been taught how to succeed and are ready to play the "repression" card at every opportunity? During an interview, she seem to avoid the fact the Uighurs beat the Han Chinese, and laid the blame on the Chinese police for shooting at the Uighurs despite video evidence Seriously? Not even a word of apology? Is she such a saint now? She doesn't care shit all, except for her own people. She's just a deluded old grandmother bet on revenge.
Ironmonkey @ 2009-07-09 23:23:57
Kali. You are a visionless, ignorant nut! The Chinese government is so scared of any potential uprising of from its own people (Han), and particularly ethnic minorities, that they crack down on any demonstrations. This is not a government in control, it is one who is in constant fear of its people and will not hesitate to suppress all human rights in order to restore some fake peace in the homeland. If no change is made, one day the people from all over China will have enough and will put down such a ruthless government: it will be blood all over.
@ 2009-07-09 02:18:47
This interview clearly reveals that Kadeer is utilizing the human rights and democracy to seek Xinjiang's independecy, as she cited "'Xinjiang’s Uighurs were to eventually win their independence." Xinjiang is not only Uighurs'. It belongs to all people in Xinjiang and in China. As President Lincoln wrote: "My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union (Letter to Horace Greeley, August 22, 1862)." When facing separasim who seeks breaking the one nation, the Union is the highest priority. China should and will do the same as what did by American. Kadeer's independent "East Turkestan" will never come.
Chan Ouyang @ 2009-07-09 02:18:15
This interview clearly reveals that Kadeer is utilizing the human rights and democracy to seek Xinjiang's independecy, as she cited "'Xinjiang’s Uighurs were to eventually win their independence." Xinjiang is not only Uighurs'. It belongs to all people in Xinjiang and in China. As President Lincoln wrote: "My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union (Letter to Horace Greeley, August 22, 1862)." When facing separasim who seeks breaking the one nation, the Union is the highest priority. China should and will do the same as what did by American. Kadeer's independent "East Turkestan" will never come.
Kali @ 2009-07-08 07:45:14
Go China! China should and will rule these crazy uighurs thugs by “blood and iron”. As a Chinese, I am really proud of the bloody blow Chinese government has dealt to these uighurs thugs. Chinese leaders should follow the footsteps of Bismarck — China “ must collect and keep its strength for the right moment, which has been missed several times already”; China’s “frontiers …. are not conducive to a healthy national life; it is not by means of speeches and majority resolutions that the great issues of the day will be decided—that was the great mistake ….—but by blood and iron”! in Just one night — 2000 crazy muslim nuts/uighurs seperatists rioters and 140+ shot dead and 1400+ arrests and 800 casualties — wow! That will sure teach those uighurs mulah nuts and tibetan monks a serious lesson — do not ever mess with CHINESE! the extraordinary harshness and swiftness of the crack down and the promptness the government handled it and anounced it tells the world loud and clear — the Chinese Nation bears absolute no mercy towards seperation by any minorities. You have Chinese Americans’ full support!
 
Name:
Email:

Comment:

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code. For security reasons, please type the code you see in the image on the left.

 

japan

japan

read more
SlimStats Ignoring Local User.