Advanced Search | Search Tips
October 2008

The Great Crash of China

by Brian Klein

Posted October 1, 2008

China is widely believed to be immune from the economic shock waves making their way around the world from the U.S. to Europe and Japan. Although it is relatively unaffected by subprime mortgages and the credit crunch, China’s economy is actually facing a fundamental structural adjustment that has arrived much earlier than expected.

Decreasing foreign demand for inexpensive manufactured goods, the misallocation of vital investment, and product safety concerns are straining China’s manufacturing base and challenging the tenuous linkages between continued economic growth and a rising middle-class.

Conventional wisdom holds that China’s domestic demand is increasingly responsible for driving growth, not exports, giving the Chinese economy a natural buffer against wild swings in the world economy. The new middle class, it is assumed, will continue buying television sets, computers, washing machines and cars – all domestically produced with cash derived from large reserves of personal savings. Domestic banks are healthy and the central government is now promoting growth through expansionary fiscal and monetary policies.

At first glance the statistics look promising. Consumer spending is up 22%, inflationary pressures are receding as food prices drop, and strong foreign exchange reserves continue to accrue ($1.8 trillion as of July). Fixed asset investment is rising as well (up 27% in the first eight months of 2008) and China’s sovereign debt rating is improving (S&P has raised long term ratings to A+.)

On closer examination, however, a vastly different story emerges. By the end of 2007 almost half of China’s GDP growth was attributed to exports and government consumption, a dramatic reversal from 2003 when growth was dominated by investment and private consumption.

While savings rates have been traditionally high, immense wealth has been invested in the stock market and real estate. The Shanghai index lost two-thirds of its value since its peak in mid-October 2007 and the Hang Seng is down over 50% from its peak a year ago.

While fixed asset investment may be rising, one-third is continuing to pour into the real-estate sector (up 29% year-on-year) despite vacant commercial floor space in China rising by 6.1% at the end of July (the latest month for available statistics). Real estate prices are experiencing their slowest growth in 18 months and new home prices in Guangzhou and Shenzhen have actually declined. Meanwhile growth in new car sales, while still robust, is slowing.

Not surprisingly, consumer confidence, according to official Chinese statistics, is drifting downwards and Western ratings on Chinese commercial banks, the holders of unused commercial real estate, are being lowered. Those on the cusp of entering the middle class are faring poorly as tens of thousands of small and medium sized enterprises go bankrupt.

Guangdong Province alone, the heart of China’s low-cost manufacturing base, has seen half of the shoe manufacturing industry close shop (over 2,200 factories) this year. These are some of the low-skill, low-wage jobs China wants to replace with high value-added manufacturing. However, there has been very little preparation for laying the foundations for such an economy. The largest destination for fixed asset investment has been manufacturing, much of which has been concentrated in low-end commodities.

The expectation in Beijing earlier this year, teeming with cranes and construction workers, was for a post-Olympic surge in foreign companies opening offices in the capital. That was of course before the threat of recession hit the world’s major economies.

Laid-off factory employees, along with millions of migrant construction workers likely to be left jobless as construction slows, will return to a countryside largely unchanged from when they left years before. It should come as no surprise then that demonstrations against local officials in smaller cities quickly escalate into “mass incidents.” Fixed investment in education, health, and social programs accounted for a paltry 2.3% of the total through July.

Unless current expansionary monetary and fiscal policies are directed at skills development, an expanded intellectual property rights enforcement bureaucracy and research and development capacity, China may be running headlong into a great economic brick wall. Rising middle class expectations, shrinking manufacturing jobs, and a lack of qualified workers are more of a threat to continued economic growth than the People’s Bank of China’s exposure to U.S. Treasury bonds.

Economic development has been the foundation of social stability and party legitimacy for the past several decades. Premier Wen, in his recent UN speech, reaffirmed China’s commitment to reform and opening. That entails some hard choices regarding China shifting away from its traditional focus on low-end production. As the world economy continues to flounder (and most expect a U.S. led turn around is at least a year away) China faces the fading memories of a successful Olympics and a wave of unemployed workers with very little to cheer about.

Brian Klein is an International Affairs Fellow of the Council on Foreign Relations.

comments (8)
Karl Marx @ 2009-01-05 19:21:01
Trouble with your expert from the US State Department is his desire to see US patterns of behavior from the Chinese state. If "by the end of 2007 almost half of China’s GDP growth was attributed to exports and government consumption" and the Chinese state is spending over 4 trillion yuan on infrastructure, health, education this will compensate for the decline in the sale of shoes, sex toys etc. to the west. It will however involve geographical movement of the economy and a major shift back towards state intervention and planning. Capitalism's apparent victorious march forward in China is going to be be halted. Lucky for them that they did not take your advise and privatise their banks before the great financial collapse in the west happened.
John Sweeney @ 2008-12-29 19:59:45
Given the historic centripetal tendencies of the Chinese peoples, the Chinese crash may just produce another Chinese civil war. China has no (public) provision for the reallocation of incomes under stress and the Chinese oligarchs (family heads) aren't willing to take any less. I give them five to ten years before meltdown.
Hardly @ 2008-12-15 08:13:45
I have friends in China in the venerable and much vaunted manufacturing sector. They say the slowdown has already hit China and is accelerating. People are very nervous out there. They see the effect of mass layoffs (in the millions) in several industries like shoes, furniture and food/necessities on people. It might just be as painful to the chinese as it is to the US, European and Australian folks.
china-bear? @ 2008-10-22 06:52:18
shrinking goverment construction in post olympia era? man, u guys have no clue of china. beijing is only the capital of china with less one 1% of total population. there r loads of cities r under development. u think 1.4 billion people r relying on half billion people's importation in usa and europe? unless u r absolultely an idiot!
Derek @ 2008-10-22 02:40:57
The support the Party currently has among Chinese people (mostly urban) is based solely on their ability to deliver economic progress on an annual basis. When the Chinese economy crashes, it will crash very hard. And when it does, the Party will lose the support of the middle-class, urban Chinese. The rural Chinese (75% of the pop.) have already given up on the Party since they've not benefited much from current policies. Uighurs & Tibetans have never supported the Party. When the economy does a nosedive, you will see massive social unrest & perhaps another revolution in China, this time against the CCP.
Harry Moon @ 2008-10-13 09:57:50
I think China must be carefull on their Fundamental Economics , and China must be have big attention and focus with this world financial situation today, The Goverment must make a step to secure their economic growth
Philippe @ 2008-10-12 23:28:48
Stop lies. The current financial crisis isn't just the now famous sub-prime crisis. The financial crisis is linked to globalization and the lack of liquidity in the West. It's time workers in the West claim the right to keep their jobs! It's time we stop giving money to Africa because we do have our own poors in Europe and Africa. It's time we tell China, that if they want to sell us goods, they'll need to come and build their manufactories on our lands and it's time for us to tell Africa that if they want help, they can open their country to foreign investors instead of chasing them away like they always did. Let us remember Congo, Algeria or even Zimbabwe more recently. Thanks for reading and commenting.
abc @ 2008-10-07 01:42:21
Great Crash? Brian Klein differs sharply from both George Soros and Niall Ferguson, who regard US be markedly weakened and China steadily strengthened by the current financial crisis. He reminds us that China has a much bigger reliance on foreign markets than what is normally reported, and the shrinking governmental construction in the post-Olympic era will limit the domestic consumption volume to fill the vacuum left by the foreign export markets. Consequently, the financial crisis–causing the foreign markets shrink and the domestic investments drop–will drag Chinese economy down to a deep pit. ... http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/guorui/2008/10/03/great-crash-or-rocky-stability/
 
Name:
Email:

Comment:

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code. For security reasons, please type the code you see in the image on the left.

 

From The Editor

From the Editor

From the Editor

read more
SlimStats Ignoring Local User.